Notes to Self

Excerpts from and musings on readings spanning poetry, philosophy (natural and otherwise), fiction and non-fiction.

I am Wendy Babiak, a poet, wife & mother, eco-feminist & activist. I think Einstein was right when he said that there are only two ways to live, as if nothing were a miracle, or as if everything is. As is clear by my use of the subjunctive for one and present tense for the other, I choose the latter.

At a deeper level, though, loneliness research forces us to acknowledge our own extraordinary malleability in the face of social forces. This susceptibility is both terrifying and exhilarating. On the terrifying side is the unhappy fact that isolation, especially when it stems from the disenfranchisement of the underprivileged, creates a bodily limitation all too easily reproduced in each successive generation. Given that we have been scaling back the kinds of programs that could help people overcome such disadvantages and that many in Congress, mostly Republicans, have been trying to defund exactly the kind of behavioral science research that could yield even better programs, we have reason to be afraid. But there’s something awe-inspiring about our resilience, too. Put an orphan in foster care, and his brain will repair its missing connections. Teach a lonely person to respond to others without fear and paranoia, and over time, her body will make fewer stress hormones and get less sick from them. Care for a pet or start believing in a supernatural being and your score on the UCLA Loneliness Scale will go down. Even an act as simple as joining an athletic team or a church can lead to what Cole calls “molecular remodeling.” “One message I take away from this is, ‘Hey, it’s not just early life that counts,’ ” he says. “We have to choose our life well.”

Posted at 11:11pm.

rafi-dangelo:

I was on my way to work, zoned out listening to some old school Shania Twain to get my life right, when two construction worker types got on the train at Penn Station.  They were both middle-aged white guys with Long Island accents, mustaches, dirty jeans — the type of guys you’d expect to see on a building site.  I caught a piece of their conversation when the music died before the song changed, and I decided to record them.

Read More

This has nothing to do with my reading but it made me so happy I had to share it.

Posted at 8:28pm.

17 essays by women that everyone should read

Posted at 9:25pm and tagged with: VIDA, essays, women,.

“The extent to which catastrophes disrupt human lives depends on whether the infrastructure of settlement has taken predictable catastrophes into account, or denied their existence. Unfortunately, the human propensity for denial often manifests in egregious and avoidable infrastructure failures. The insufficient engineering and reinforcement of the New Orleans levees, breached by the storm surge of Hurricane Katrina, in just one example. The dike systems in the Sacramento Delta are famously vulnerable. The homes being built in the path of wildfires at the urban-wildland interface, whether in the San Bernadino canyons of California or the lodgepole-pine forests of the northern Rockies, are practically earmarked for destruction. Such examples suggest that American-style affluence does nothing to curb folly.”

from “Place Breaking,” WorldChanging: A User’s Guide for the 21st Century,  pg. 479.

Posted at 5:28pm.

Mohamed Ibn Al Ajami sentenced to life in prison for crime of reciting a poem. Help correct this injustice.

David Frum, America’s voting system is a disgrace - CNN.com (via dendroica)

—this is completely true (Politicalprof)

Posted at 9:35am.

In any other democracy, voters nationwide would have cast their votes on the same kind of balloting equipment, subject to the same rules.


The parties would have had a minimal role in supervising the election, and certainly would not have been allowed to ask for rule changes as the vote occurred.

The voting would have been overseen by a national election commission, not by local judges, who might be nonpartisan — but who very well might not.

Americans worry more about voter fraud than do voters in other countries, because they are the only country without a reliable system of national identification.

In no other country, including federal systems such as Germany, Canada and Australia, does the citizen’s opportunity to vote depend on the affluence and competence of his or her local government.

In every other democracy, the vote is the means by which the people choose between the competing political parties — not one more weapon by which the parties compete.

The United States is an exceptional nation, but it is not always exceptional for good. The American voting system too is an exception: It is the most error-prone, the most susceptible to fraud, the most vulnerable to unfairness and one of the least technologically sophisticated on earth. After the 2000 fiasco, Americans resolved to do better. Isn’t it past time to make good on that resolution?

noraleah:

Women showed up to vote.

They showed up early and they showed up strong.

And not only that — women *my age* showed up to vote.

Our great-grandmothers fought for the right to vote today.

Our grandmothers fought for the right to work outside the home.

Our mothers fought for the right to be treated with respect.

Don’t pick a fight with us.

And now my daughter is ready to fight. Be advised: we’ll use however many waves it takes to topple patriarchy.

Posted at 9:08am.

the-how-to:

by Suzanne Roberts

1. Don’t tell me you want to write a book with me. Last week, I got a very excited phone message from an old friend. She said, “Since you have free time this summer, I was thinking we’d write a book together…here’s what it will be about….” This is not the first time I have heard this from friends, people I love and who love me. People who are not writers. But when they tell me that I have free time since I have 12 weeks to write (I teach community college full-time and thankfully do have a summer to write) and that their idea is the one I should pursue (with them because really, anyone can write a book if she has a good idea). I left a polite message explaining that really, I didn’t have any free time. I was squeezing a full-time writing life into a 12-week sliver and that I already had projects enough to pursue and that she should write the book herself. I said Good luck! And I tried not to sound ironic even though I felt ironic. Here’s why: imagine you are a rocket scientist and I called you up and left you this message: “Let’s build a rocket together this summer! I have a great idea for one, and I just know it would be successful. Oprah would probably even want to ride in it!” Now, you would think, how can you build a rocket when you have no training? Rocket science takes years of education, of training, of studying the way other rockets work, of trial and error. You have to build smaller machines before you build rockets. You have to fail many times before you build a rocket that will even leave the earth, much less fly to outer space. You have to dedicate your entire life to rockets. Now, replace rockets with writing. Exactly.

2. Don’t ask me to write or edit your resume, brochure, website, or dissertation for free. And unless your writer friend is a Yenta like me with a weird affinity for matchmaking, don’t ask her to write your match.com profile. While it’s true that my profiles have fetched dates—two leading to marriages, one straight, one gay—I have retired from profile-making, so don’t ask. Would you ask your dentist friend for a free root canal? Your match.com profile takes me more time than your root canal.

3. If I have met you at a dinner party, or anyplace else for that matter, don’t ask me what my real job is after I have told you that I am a writer. My real job, the one I have been educated and training for, is my real job. My real job is the one that I must do, the one that makes me feel like a complete human being, the one that gives something of value to the world. To do my real job I must be brave and I must be unapologetic. Do you have a real job?

4. Don’t follow up the question in #3 with the question, “But how do you make money?” You will be more likely to ask this if I have said “I am a poet,” which takes more courage even than “I am a writer.” I make money any way I can. I make money, but that is less important than the fact that I make poems and stories and essays and books. I make worlds. Buy a book and enter my worlds. Then you would not have to wonder why my real job doesn’t make me any money. You will also not have to wonder why you have never heard of me. Perhaps if you read more widely, you would have.

5. Don’t tell me how bad your grammar is or that you have always been terrible in English. I know you think it is a compliment, but really it makes me uncomfortable. It makes me feel like you are trying to give value to what I do because it isn’t really that valuable. People are expected to be able to say a sentence with correct grammar. Does that equate to being able to write a book? It does not. I can cut up a chicken, but I cannot operate on someone’s brain. When you tell me you are a brain surgeon, I do not say, “Hey, I am TERRIBLE at cutting into people’s brains!” You would assume that to be true. Cutting up a chicken is to brain surgery as saying a correct sentence is to writing a book. Both are a start.

Read More

Posted at 10:21pm.

Vandana Siva, Staying Alive

Posted at 11:40pm.

In this non-gender based philosophy the feminine principle is not exclusively embodied in women, but is the principle of activity and creativity in nature, women and men.

Maldevelopment is seen here as a process by which human society marginalises the play of the feminine principle in nature and in society. Ecological breakdown and social inequality are intrinsically related to the dominant development paradigm which puts man against and above nature and women. The underlying assumptions of dialectical unity and cyclical recovery shared by the common concern for the liberation of nature and of women, con-trast deeply with the dominant western patriarchal assumptions of duality in existence and linearity in process. Within the western paradigm, the environmental movement is separate from the women’s movement. As long as this paradigm with its assumptions of linear progress prevails, ‘environmentalism’ and ‘feminism’ independently ask only for concessions within maldevelopment, because in the absence of oppositional categories, that is the only ‘development’ that is conceivable. Environmentalism then becomes a new patriarchal project of technological fixes and political oppression. It generates a new subjugation of ecological movements and fails to make any progress towards sustainability and equity. While including a few women as tokens in ‘women and environment’, it excludes the feminine visions of survival that women have conserved. Fragmented feminism, in a similar way, finds itself trapped in a gender-based ideology of liberation -taking off from either the ‘catching-up-with-men’ syndrome (on the grounds that the masculine is superior and developed), or receding into a narrow biologism which accepts the feminine as gendered, and excludes the possibility of the recovery of the feminine principle in nature and women, as well as men.

From *Staying Alive*

Posted at 11:26pm and tagged with: Vandana Siva, patriarchy, maldevelopment,.